.bad things 2
Some things are clearly bad. Sprouts, for example, and the "music" of Metallica. Yet some people still persist in claiming that these things are actually Good, and will continue to do so until they are soundly beaten around the head with a hammer. Or forced to look at its non-violent, Internet-based alternative, which is the list below. This as-yet-unspecified-period-of-time: television.
.television
No, not the 70s US band, or the object itself (although clearly sitting in front
of a box emitting laser-beams of death for three hours a night can't be a *good
thing*, even if there was something remotely entertaining on). No. The reason
why Television is a Bad Thing is that it emits crap. Nearly every house in the
so-called "First World" has a TV set, correctiment? So millions and
millions - nay, billions - of people have a direct connection to the Mother
Of All Rubbish. But my ire is directed more specifically at British television
for a number of key reasons.
1. There's no sort of variety. Unless you are particularly unburdened
with interestingness, the prospect of three hours of wall-to-wall gardening
programmes is enough to make you wish you were a polar bear in some remote Alaskan
colony. It's heartbreaking when even the prospect of cuddly Alan Titchmarch
is not enough to lift your leaden heart. Or something.
2. It's dumb.
Although we don't want Jeremy "Jezza" Paxman lecturing us about the
links between 21st-century post-modernism and the accounts of Hegel in the 1840s,
neither do we want Carol Smilie redecorating dustbins in Essex. Why are there
no programmes that tell us about new stuff? Why should we be interested in other
people's "lives" which, even if they were real, are probably no different
from our own? And why should we have to put up with Julian-fripping-Clary?
3. It costs
money. Sounds silly, but we're paying for this stuff. I mean, if we went
to Argos and bought some shelves and then got them home to find they were made
out of smoked haddock, we'd take them back because they wouldn't work very well,
wouldn't we? Well, we are given TV on the presupposition that it'll be fun,
and interesting, and entertaining, and not the audio-visual equivalent of a
hernia.
4. British people
watch it *instead* of doing other things.
"What are we doing tonight?" all too often means, "What's on
the television tonight?" Although I wouldn't be so cretinous as to suggest
that people can't talk properly, or something, because of watching TV (let alone,
god forbid, suggesting that people become violent because they see Reservoir
Dogs on telly), I would say that life would be far more interesting if people
didn't just watch telly because there was nothing better to do.
5. It's not
really that enjoyable unless it's good.
Try sitting in your favourite chair for two hours solid, not doing anything
at all except stare at a fixed point just ahead of you. It's very, very dull.
That's what you're doing when you watch rubbish TV.
6. I can never get back the time I spend watching rubbish television. Nuff said.
See? It's rubbish. Now, with these things in mind, let's look at how the programme-makers might come up with a brand new, exciting television product.
a. Choose a
genre. Roll a dice to select one of the programme types from list A below,
and then one from list B.
List
A
|
1.Cookery...
|
2.Gardening...
|
3.Chat
show...
|
4.Quiz
show...
|
5."Real
Life" Documentary...
|
6.Sit"com"
|
List
B
|
1...starring
an ex-Big Brother "celeb"
|
2...filmed
in a glitzy studio in London
|
3...about
some "amusing" minority group
|
4...featuring
a gravelly voice-over
|
5...within
a strict time-limit
|
6...with
canned laughter
|
Done that? Good. We got, for example, "Cookery within a strict time limit", which is Ready Steady Cook, and "Chat show with canned laughter" which is Esther. But there must be some new possiblities out of the twenty-five permutations available, so keep going until you come up with something original. Alternatively...
b. Sell your tired concept to the BBC. They will buy it for similar amounts
of money needed by small African nations to wipe out poverty for the year. Congratulations!
Now you must...
c. Choose a host for your new show! As above, roll a dice, and get the
person who corresponds to your number!
Dial-a-celebrity!
|
1.
Carol Vorderman
|
2.
Carol Smilie
|
3.
Davina McCall
|
4.
Dale Winton
|
5.
An(g)us Deayton
|
6.
Jonathan Creek
|
Hard this, isn't it? You can see why programme-makers are so respected. We've
got two now: "Cookery within a strict time limit, presented by Dale Winton"
(hgggh), and "Chat show with canned laughter, presented by Davina McCall"
(which can only be a matter of time now, really). There we go! Now...
d. Choose a
time-slot for your programme! Since all forms of news broadcasting have
been pushed back beyond midnight, there's a wealth of time for light-entertainment
guff. You choose, really. Just not 10pm, else hard man Pete Sissons'll be round
yer house, and then you'll be sorry.
There we go!
You've made your very own programme! Now give it a name by doing the same
as you did above, rolling two dice and choosing a name from each list. Add the
joining words of your choice!
List
A
|
1.
Pets, and their owners...
|
2.
The World's Most Amazing...
|
3.
Accidents...
|
4.
Blind...
|
5.
Who Wants To Be A...
|
6.
True Stories Of...
|
List
B
|
1...Caught
Live on Camera!
|
2...Raw
Sewage Collectors!
|
3...Celebrity
Shopping!
|
4...Ritual
Humiliation!
|
5...dahlings
in East London!
|
6...Date!
|
Of course, you may be unhappy with your choice. For instance, we've come
up with "Who Wants To Be A Date?", in which contestants aim to become
pieces of dried fruit, and "True Stories of Ritual Humiliation", which
comes a little close to home. So you may now - if you wish - play your wildcard,
which today takes the form of a pun-based title.
e. Pun-based titles are cool! At this stage you may be distinctly unhappy
with the way your programme is shaping up. So why not take the alternative route
so loved by TV directors everywhere? Choose a programme type, presenter, and
title all linked by some appalling pun? For example, here's some ones we thought
of:
- Pot Luck!
[Cookery show] Chefs choose five ingredients at random from an unmarked bag,
and have twenty minutes to cook with them! Presented by Richard Bacon.
- Out of the Frying Pan, Into the Fire! [Chat show] In which top TV chefs
have to face a grilling about past misdemeanours! With Anne "Badgerface"
Robinson.
- Angling for Promotion! [Game show] In which three fisherman compete
to catch fish! In Anglesea! The winner gets a promotion. Presented by Angler
Rippon.
- Dimmock's Hammocks! ["Gardening" show] Thirty minutes of
top TV gardener "Charlie" Dimmock lying in different hammocks! With
no bra on! Enough to get the average British male's heart started.
- Fork in the Road! [Sitcom] Middle-aged cutlery salesman Brian Fork
faces a middle-life crisis when his wife Gwen leaves him! Does he continue in
the cutlery industry he's become disillusioned with, or start life anew somewhere
else? Starring Uri Gellar.
See? There's
so much scope for sheer rubbish. And you don't even have to try that hard at
all. You too could have a lucrative job in the world of TeleVision. Thankyou,
thankyou, and goodnight.